On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 23:24 +0100, Javier Barroso wrote: > Hello, > On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:07:48 +0200 > =?UTF-8?B?IklPaGFubmVzIG0gem3DtmxuaWcgKERlYmlhbi9HTlUpIg==?= > <umlae...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 10/07/2014 11:59 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > > i am hit by the same problem. > > > as a temporary fix, i added the 'vgchange -ay' to > > > /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/lvm2 > > > as adding it to > > > /etc/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/vgscan > > > somehow did not work (most likely due wrong order of execution, but i did > > > not > > > investigate further) > > > > i turned out that i had forgotten to set +x permissions for > > /etc/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/vgscan > > Is there any reference about why this change is not made ?
I'm not sure this is correct and I haven't found much time to work on initramfs-tools yet. > All my debian systems with separated /usr are not booting until they > are fixed with "vgchange -ay". I don't like such manually changes. > > Having a Debian Installation which not boot is a hurt for Debian (I'm > sure many people discard Debian when it doesn't boot, all Debian Sid > Users wait their boot problems solved upgrading its systems the next > week, having a updated Debian Sid two months without booting , is a > not go). > > Should Debian Users discard /usr and merge into / ? Yes. > Is this bug left open with such idea at mind? No, this bug should be fixed. > Where is the danger of such fix ? Do you know which would be the > perfect solution? Not yet. Ben. > Thank you very much and sorry for my english > > -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
