Hi, thanks for interest in working on this!
On 01/15/2014 12:25 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > I ask it to the debian kernel maintainers with the lack of > knowledge that what it implies, because for example: > > - xenomai doesn't work in all architectures than debian. - it has > patches for previous versions of the linux provided by debian. - > who maintain it? > > However, I think that we can have interested people to work on > that, and could be affordable. One of the biggest obstacles is the release schedules of Debian and Xenomai projects, and I can't expect either of them to follow the other. This implies that Debian typically includes an outdated version of Xenomai in its stable version even though I include the respective latest Xenomai release always immediately into Debian unstable. In addition, kernels supported by official Xenomai patches also typically differ from the ones that Debian ships. Since Debian synchronizes quite well now with kernel.org stable branches, there is at least a good chance to synchronize in this second regard. Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
