On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 13:31 +0800, Niew, Sh. wrote: > On Dec 13, 2013, at 6:34 PM, Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:54 +0800, Niew, Sh. wrote: > > [...] > >> Is it ahci_imx need ahci_platform compile with yes? > > > > IMHO it should be loaded automatically as required. This is probably > > something which you need to take up with the upstream developers I'm > > afraid. > > Before reaching to the upstream, i get the v3.13-rc4 a shot > And the issue is eliminate, but i not include every part as like the debian > config included.
So to make sure I understand what you are saying: You built upstream v3.13-rc4 with a config which was different to the Debian one and it worked fine? If so then either something is fixed between 3.12.3 and 3.13-rc4 or there is something in the config which matters. My money would be on a code change, but perhaps you could try with a config which is mostly the same as the Debian one? (i.e. start from the Debian config and run "make oldconfig"). > At least with: > > $ grep AHCI /boot/config-3.13.0-rc4 > CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=m > CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM=m > CONFIG_AHCI_IMX=m > # CONFIG_SATA_ACARD_AHCI is not set > > $ grep SATA /boot/config-3.13.0-rc4 > # CONFIG_SATA_PMP is not set > CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=m > CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM=m > # CONFIG_SATA_INIC162X is not set > # CONFIG_SATA_ACARD_AHCI is not set > # CONFIG_SATA_SIL24 is not set The two big differences from the Debian config look like SATA_ACARD_AHCI and SATA_PMP, I don't really know what they are but they don't seem like they would be related to the sort of issue you are seeing. Eventually I expect 3.13-rcX will hit experimental, it would be worth retesting at that point. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1387274297.27441.21.ca...@kazak.uk.xensource.com
