On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 22:26 +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > On 09/08/2013 04:19 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > >> On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > >>> Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the > >>> non-smp kernels. > >> I can do that. Do you have some background on this request for me? > >> Is it policy that you only want to gave SMP-kernels? > > > > We like to lower the image count. As long as there are no pressing > > needs, we like to only have one kernel variant. > > Ok. > > > Are there any UP machines since PA-8800? > > After the request to reduce the kernels to e.g. SMP-only, my thought was > to provide only 32bit-UP and 64bit SMP kernels. > To be sure I asked on the parisc mailing list. The whole thread can be read > here: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.parisc/5283 > > Summary: > - yes, there exists quite some 32bit-only parisc SMP machines. > - the J5600 is SMP capable in both 32bit and 64bit mode, but currently it > only boots Linux with a 32bit SMP kernel and crashes with a 64bit SMP > kernel. > We are working on resolving this... [...]
Looks like you fixed this one:
commit 54e181e073fc1415e41917d725ebdbd7de956455
Author: Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de>
Date: Sat Oct 26 23:19:25 2013 +0200
parisc: Do not crash 64bit SMP kernels on machines with >= 4GB RAM
Can you send a new config patch?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Knowledge is power. France is bacon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
