On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now that the discussion went off from "you stupid kernel developers *lol*. i get that summary ["you said people were stupid!!!"] a lot. i don't quite understand where it comes from, otherwise i would stop doing it :) > adopted DeviceTree without even asking a closed company about their > proprietary solution, which does the same" to something a bit more > constructive, let me point some of the benefits. > [snip...] ahh, magic. these have gone straight into that proposal. i think the best ones - the gems - are the test-coverage and formally allowing public interaction. the test coverage because it will reduce the risk of errors in the silicon [you never know when developing both hardware and software where the bug might be] as well as reduce the development time and development costs. the public interaction (which i was going to ask thomas and maxime about, this morning) because it means a much faster feedback loop. i've been trying to think of ways to link "if you do X it will result in more sales and reduce risk" to the discussion, and i think you finally hit it tomasz, so thank you. l. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/capweedwon7x-frqurvkdnxu3ncyogrezy9v5q8zxvoe6kwk...@mail.gmail.com
