[removing debian-release again - at their request] On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Allwinner has just reinvented a wheel, without even considering the fact > that it has been already invented. apologies, tomasz, but i believe i covered this issue in, again, my reply to russell, in which i point out that the both the context as well as the scope of the problem being solved is entirely different from that which the linux kernel developers find themselves in. also, we note from what russell said, was that device tree wasn't ready for commercial deployment; allwinner's developers don't speak english, and additionally a fabless semiconductor company need to maintain absolute commercial secrecy at the all-critical time when they're doing FPGA-based testing of their netlists (yes, really: running linux on a huge $250k's worth of FPGAs) and haven't yet put the design into actual silicon. so there's a lot of factors which i believe the linux kernel developers are not aware of, and haven't taken into account, and to place blame onto the SoC vendors for not working with *you* when *you* haven't made an effort to understand their situation is, i feel, not really helping anyone. not that i'm one to talk about understanding people, but hey... :) l. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPweEDwyX4=sme9kydu64k9h3spuhuerd8geqfdylgwbooc...@mail.gmail.com
