On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 16:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I would much prefer a name that will provide a more useful distinction > > in future (and not be too long!). Perhaps it should refer to the CPU > > requirement like the flavours for some other architectures. > > How about the same scheme as on other arches? > > linux-image-`uname -r`-armel
I think the question here is what the `uname -r` bit should be. Specifically the $FLAVOUR in 3.x.y-z-$FLAVOUR. I think there is an argument for making the multiplatform case be the default "no-flavour flavour" i.e. $FLAVOUR is armhf/arm64 etc. Or maybe that's what you are suggesting having not realised that `uname -r` currently includes the -$FLAVOUR suffix. Hrm, I think we may actually be talking about the same thing ;-) > linux-image-`uname -r`-armhf > linux-image-`uname -r`-arm64 > > Or maybe the CPU is better: > > linux-image-`uname -r`-armv4 > linux-image-`uname -r`-armv7 > linux-image-`uname -r`-armv8 > > -- > bye, > pabs > > http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1363705537.2891.41.ca...@dagon.hellion.org.uk
