Dear Ben, >>>> PAE is broken for any amount of RAM. >>> No it isn't. >> Could I please ask you to expand on that? > > I already did, a few messages back.
OK, thanks. Noting however that fewer than those back, I said: ... PAE with any RAM fails the "sleep test": n=0; while [ $n -lt 33000 ]; do sleep 600 & ((n=n+1)); done and somewhere also said that non-PAE passes. Does not that prove that PAE is broken? Cheers, Paul Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201302010313.r113dtj3027...@como.maths.usyd.edu.au
