Xavi León wrote:

>                                       In [2] and [3] (patches 19901 -
> 19915) you can find the patches for upstream kernel 3.2 and 3.3
> respectively. I tested them and they work, although I cannot assure
> they are correct and bug free. To be honest, I doubt they can make it
> upstream in their current shape.

Excellent, thanks for explaining.

[...]
> I can certainly sign-off them if you are willing to continue the work
> on them. However, I don't have a clear idea on how to proceed once
> they are signed-off. Do I need to send them here? Is it ok to just
> link to the github repo [2-3]?

It's useful that they are in an actively maintained repo.  To sign off,
it would be enough to send a message saying that you certify what is
said in the Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 --- there's no need
to actually modify the patches, since we can do that already. :)

To be honest, I don't know what would happen next, but that would give
us everything we need for someone to submit these for discussion
upstream.  Once the patches are in linux-next, we can take them.

Regards,
Jonathan

> [1] http://lxc.sourceforge.net/patches/linux/3.0.0/3.0.0-lxc1/patches/
> [2] 
> https://github.com/confine-project/openwrt/tree/master/target/linux/generic/patches-3.2
> [2] 
> https://github.com/confine-project/openwrt/tree/master/target/linux/generic/patches-3.3


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121017164905.GA12456@elie.Belkin

Reply via email to