Hi, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> If by 'optional dependencies' you mean assuming a feature provided by a > package on which the dependency is not declared as absolute, there are > certainly solutions; declare the dependency as absolute or stop assuming the > feature's presence. Neither of those would be appropriate in this case. However, if you'd like to improve the error message, that would probably be a welcome change upstream. Upstream would be the place to propose such a change (with a patch); it does not seem worth tracking in Debian. Thanks for your help, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120920043655.GA2924@elie.Belkin
