On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 13:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2012-07-25 13:30 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:39:29PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 07:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > >> > Source: linux > >> > Version: 3.2.20-1 > >> > > >> > Hi kernel maintainers, > >> > > >> > Gergely Nagy wrote: > >> > > >> > > reassign 679226 src:linux-2.6 3.2.20-1 > >> > > >> > Several bugs seem to have been filed against the nonexistent 'src' > >> > package recently. I am guessing this means reportbug or some related > >> > tool does not know how to deal with 'src:linux' as a package name. > >> > Please use plain 'linux' for now. > >> > >> reportbug-ng is doing this. Let's get it fixed. > > > > Recent bugs reported against 'src' have "X-Mailer: reportbug 6.4" > > Looks like reportbug is buggy too. > > This seems to be a side effect of the fix for #666469, FWIW.
That looks plausible. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
