Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > (putting back the CC to the bug, which will probably need to be > reassigned to 'linux') > 2012/7/13 Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>: >> (dropping dpkg maintainers from cc) >> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>>> I'm already aware of the effects of stripping binaries. However, you >>> gotta admit that 488MB compared to 22MB is just ridiculous; something >>> is definitely broken in those 3.2 build scripts. >> >> Are the build scripts responsible for the size of debugging symbols? >> I don't follow. >> >> Or do you mean that the size of the kernel -dbg packages is >> ridiculous? > > I mean that the size of the kernel package produced by 'make deb-pkg' > from the 3.2 vanilla tree, even after disabling debug symbols, is > highly suspicious, compared to the stock Debian kernel with the same > source. Ok, I missed that. What is that size? Just to confirm, are you certain CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is disabled? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120713200721.GD30693@burratino
