On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:32:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 05:36 +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> > And, even if it was, as far as I understand it, moving a bunch of
> > bare-metal USB sticks from some an always-on server in a datacenter to
> > another one, and sharing the stick over IP, is no solution for us: our
> > problem is to avoid plugging a bunch of bare-metal USB sticks into
> > a server in a datacenter, in the first place.
> >
> > So, unfortunately, it looks like no existing solution currently in
> > Debian is good enough for our needs.
>
> Yes, but I think it would make more sense to emulate a USB storage
> device in qemu rather than the host kernel.
>
> I don't know; would be interested to hear other people's opinions on
> this.
AFAIK, you're right, qemu can emulate USB, but it's quite slow, not really
completely implemented yet, and I haven't found a way to boot on such an
emulated usb device in the VM. Sounds like it's more usefull when you want
to hot{plus,unplug} USB devices in a running VM.
So it doesn't appear so reliable nor covering our use cases compared to
the kernel module we are talking about, which is in the kernel tree since
a lot of time and as such is more stable.
I believe that adding this module to the Debian kernel might also be
usefull for Debian Live, but I don't want to speak for them.
bert.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627110022.GA4140@localhost
