On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 10:43:25AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Josh Triplett wrote: > > Less so, but yes. As far as I know, sbs-battery drives a superset of > > hardware, but bq20z75 does drive a useful subset (though one that > > doesn't include the hardware I actually have). Having bq20z75 in the > > wheezy 3.2 kernel wouldn't serve the particular purpose I had in mind > > for it, but it seems potentially useful. > > Do you know of relevant patches that could change that? (I.e., maybe > this is a candidate for a driver backport.)
I just reviewed the history of sbs-battery and bq20z75 carefully, and it looks like my guess does not match reality: sbs-battery and bq20z75 drive the same hardware, and the change just represents a rename. I do see a couple of fixes to sbs-battery after the renaming that seem potentially useful, but not sufficiently so to backport them unless someone needs them. - Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120609213918.GA16807@leaf
