Le 03/03/2012 14:55, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > Thanks. Does the attached patch help?
Yes, mostly. It took me a while (the test machine was randomly freezing because of unrelated ACPI issue) but the patch does appears to fix the noflushd problem. With original 2.6.32-5-686 (fresh squeeze install on a x86 machine) after 15 minutes of uptime and noflushd running: 354 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 50.8 0.0 0:24.36 flush-8:0 13101 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 46.9 0.0 0:14.12 flush-8:32 (/etc/init.d/noflushd stop "clears" the issue) With the patched kernel (linux-2.6_2.6.32.orig.tar.gz + writeback-fixups-for-dirty_writeback_centisecs.patch -- linux-2.6_2.6.32-41.diff not applied), I do not have anymore the flush problem. However, the ksoftirqd process shows up time to time and eats some CPU: 4 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 28.2 0.0 0:06.55 ksoftirqd/0 This is not an issue as the load average stays very low (0,10) ; but the problem disappears totally when using 3.2.9. [ Note: if a disk is going idle because of a previous "/sbin/hdparm -SXXX /dev/sdXXX", the 100% CPU issue comes back (but can be solved by awakening the disk), which is not the case in 3.2.9, strangely. ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f52777f.7040...@httrack.com