On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 19:19, Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 11:14 +0100, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
>> ttyUSB0 acts like a modem. That it opens instantly holds with picocom >> as well, the other ones hang for a bit. >> ttyUSB1 doesn't seem to take AT commands (no response). >> ttyUSB2 takes AT commands. >> >> Both AT-capable ports reply "COMMAND NOT SUPPORT" [sic] to AT^GETPORTMODE. > > But ttyUSB2 still has the close() blocking problem while ttyUSB0 does > not? Yes. ttyUSB2 has the same functionality as 0 and the same timing issues as 1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAO=zwdjtexkrxx6d36lnpzl7r44p4gcwcxekq9t_+st5ufv...@mail.gmail.com
