purdyd tds.net wrote:

> Thnx for the response... I'm game to try both of those versions
> linux-image-kirkwood-3.2.0-rc[4,7], but I've been unable to actually find
> the binaries in snapshot.debian.org.

Oh, you're right.

After a little more investigation, the grounds for my guess were wrong
anyway.  I guess I would want to know instead:

 - where can I read a little about the many users experiencing this?
   (e.g., was there a mailing list discussion?)  That might help in
   pinning down relevant variables.

 - what is the newest version you know of that worked?  One can use
   https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=linux-2.6&arch=armel to
   find which versions actually got built on arm, or something like

        fakeroot debian/rules source
        fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_armel_none_kirkwood

to build a version if you have the source installed.

Sorry for the confusion,
Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120206153403.GB9638@burratino

Reply via email to