merge 658670 658727 quit Csaba GAAL wrote:
> [To: sub...@bugs.debian.org] For the future, you can followup by sending email to 658...@bugs.debian.org (for example using your mailer's "reply to all" feature), or, if you don't have a working email setup, by using "reportbug -N 658670". Submitting a separate new bug with each message just makes for more work on this end... [...] > Just a preview of what's coming: still > linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64_2.6.39-3_amd64 > is free from this speed regression problem, however for the record I am going > to > file separate reports for: > 1) linux-image-2.6.35-rc5-amd64_2.6.35~rc5-1~experimental.1_amd64 > 2) linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64_2.6.36~rc5-1~experimental.1_amd64 > 3) linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64_2.6.37-2_amd64 > 4) linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64_2.6.38-5_amd64 > 5) linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64_2.6.39-3_amd64 No thank you. So, which is the first version with the speed degredation? Thanks for the quick followup. Sincerely, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120205151156.GB32584@burratino
