reassign 656877 flash-kernel 2.37 quit Guillard wrote: > Le 22/01/2012 18:01, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>> Did you flash the kernel correctly? > > Indeed I did not and flash-kernel did not run by itself > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550584 ?). > > # ls -ltr /boot/ > total 8480 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 12288 6 Nov 20:40 lost+found > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 6 Nov 20:52 vmlinuz -> > vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-kirkwood > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 6 Nov 20:52 initrd.img -> > initrd.img-2.6.32-5-kirkwood > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2339194 6 Nov 21:07 uInitrd > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1435728 6 Nov 21:07 uImage > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1434052 12 Jan 11:04 vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-kirkwood > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1004729 12 Jan 11:05 System.map-2.6.32-5-kirkwood > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 84134 12 Jan 11:05 config-2.6.32-5-kirkwood > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2328363 16 Jan 18:39 initrd.img-2.6.32-5-kirkwood Am I correct in guessing that the installed flash-kernel is version 2.37? Hmm, this doesn't seem to be the same as 550584 since in this example the kernel was flashed when creating the initramfs and not when updating it 2.6.32-38 -> 2.6.32-39squeeze1, instead of the other way around. Reassigning. flash-kernel maintainers, please feel free to assign as appropriate once this is understood better. Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120122220641.GB32075@burratino
