On 1/2/12 8:13 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Currently the value reported for max_batch_time is really the
> value of min_batch_time.
>
> Reported-by: Russell Coker <russ...@coker.com.au>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
whoops, yep!
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sand...@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 3e1329e..410e993 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static int ext4_show_options(struct seq_file *seq,
> struct vfsmount *vfs)
> }
> if (sbi->s_max_batch_time != EXT4_DEF_MAX_BATCH_TIME) {
> seq_printf(seq, ",max_batch_time=%u",
> - (unsigned) sbi->s_min_batch_time);
> + (unsigned) sbi->s_max_batch_time);
> }
>
> /*
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f0322d0.2070...@redhat.com
