On Sat, 2011-12-31 at 11:43 +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote: > Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> writes: > Hi, > > > On 12/30/2011 11:23 PM, Jakub Adam wrote: > >>> on which platforms? i.e. are the "architecture templates" updated to > >>> build on > >>> more than amd64 and i386? > >> > >> There are arm, ia64, mips, ppc and sparc in the additional architectures - > >> see > >> contents of > >> debian/eclipse-build-additionalArchs.tar.bz2. > >> > >> I tried to build the armel variant and successfully compiled > >> org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.arm > >> plugin, which failed in previous 3.7.0-1 version[1], though I wasn't able > >> to > >> finish the complete > >> build because of insufficient amount of RAM (seems it's not possible to > >> use more > >> than 256MB > >> with arm in qemu). > > > > currently the heap of a process on ARM is limited to 2GB (which is still not > > enough to build eclipse). There is a fix submitted upstream which should > > help > > with this (https://launchpad.net/bugs/861296), although it needs deployment > > on > > the armel and armhf builders as well. This will allow building some more > > haskell packages as well. > > The patches have been merged in different trees: > > - > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=41dfaa934c5d866d626de9bea785e6168524a47e > - > http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux-2.6-arm.git;a=commit;h=7dbaa466780a754154531b44c2086f6618cee3a8 > > 3.2 will have the first patch but the second is for 3.3.
Can we cherry-pick it now? Are there any other changes not in 3.2 that we would need to take? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
