On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 22:12, Christian PERRIER <bubu...@debian.org> wrote: > Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): >> Mostly; the only addition situation we'll need to rebuild the >> installer is when the amount of translation changes for a specific >> language so we get the 'translation-status' file updated into the >> initrd. > > We might need to find a way to avoid rebuilding just because *one* > language changed. Mostly because this happens really often..we don't > really have control about the translator's schedule and they happen to > commit things more or less randomly (with peaks when something is > changed in a string, or when strings are added: some like to be 100% > all time long..:-)).
But this will change only when we upload the package to the archive so we can try to upload a set of packages with translation updates to avoid this. Basically the binNMU would be triggered when the translation status change for a language and since we work with percentage this will not change on every translation update. > As I'm watching all this very regularly, we could maybe imagine > something where the i18n coordinator can trigger an l10n-rebuild > because (s)he notices that a given language changed significantly > enough to be worth it....or because it has been too much time since > the last rebuild and many very small changes piled up. Or maybe if there's no initrd changes queue it to the end of week if nothing else changes? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odko0ent87kdj_cevexzwi+g+iedn8r9__kqgluzn7_u...@mail.gmail.com
