Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Michael Tokarev wrote:

>> So, the problem is that with this kernel commit:
>>
>> commit 7972995b0c346de76fe260ce0fd6bcc8ffab724a
>> Author: Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com>
>> Date:   Thu Mar 18 15:20:24 2010 +0200
>>
>>     KVM: x86 emulator: Move string pio emulation into emulator.c
>[...]
>> which went into mainline with 2.6.35, there has been
>> quite some changes in PIO emulation handling in kvm
>> which resulted in correct but slow (as opposed by
>> fast but incorrect) emulation.  This slowed down
>> guests that use PIO to access disks.
[...]
> That means "wishlist", and probably not worth tracking unless we want
> to document it somewhere or someone is interested in working on it,
> right?

On second thought, a regression's a regression --- going from usable
but subtly buggy to unusable is not progress. :)  Maybe it would be
possible to introduce some kind of parameter to get back the speed
at the cost of correctness again?

Just musing.  Sorry for the noise; I'll leave this to the experts.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110719091309.ga24...@elie.gateway.2wire.net

Reply via email to