Hi Maks and Kir
Kir: Some updated statement from Maks.
Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in
Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what
revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates.
// Ola
Quoting "maximilian attems" <m...@stro.at>:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
Hi ola,
my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero.
see
http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary
and in contrary
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1
wrong c&p, meant of course,
see how happily that tree is maintained regularly:
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel6/042stab017.1
They *don't* update their git tree.
come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41
So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated
stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different.
--
--- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
/ o...@inguza.com Annebergsslingan 37 \
| o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| http://inguza.com/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110620150057.20385ltvvew3u...@webmail.inguza.net
