On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 08:47 +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote: > Ben Hutchings hat am Tue 26. Apr, 04:47 (+0100) geschrieben: > > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 23:35 +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote: > > > Jörg Sommer hat am Mon 25. Apr, 23:21 (+0200) geschrieben: > > > > Ben Hutchings hat am Sun 03. Apr, 03:06 (+0100) geschrieben: > > > > > /sbin/blkid -o device | while read device; do > > > > > echo "$device:" > > > > > /sbin/blkid -o udev -s LABEL -s UUID -s TYPE "$device" > > > > > done > > > > > > > > /dev/sda1 > > > > ID_FS_UUID=a59a6be1-01ac-2c7a-12ab-c8dc8e4c3255 > > > > ID_FS_UUID_ENC=a59a6be1-01ac-2c7a-12ab-c8dc8e4c3255 > > > > ID_FS_LABEL=_grml_:0 > > > > ID_FS_LABEL_ENC=\x27grml\x27:0 > > > > ID_FS_TYPE=linux_raid_member > > > > /dev/sda2 > > > > ID_FS_LABEL=Linux_Var > > > > ID_FS_LABEL_ENC=Linux_Var > > > > ID_FS_UUID=60342ce9-209a-4b60-97b5-7d9309751202 > > > > ID_FS_UUID_ENC=60342ce9-209a-4b60-97b5-7d9309751202 > > > > ID_FS_TYPE=ext4 > > > > > > That's strange. sda2 is a RAID member. I don't know why blkid thinks it's > > > a standalone filesystem. > > > > Yes, that's weird. > > > > But now that I look over the code again, I think the bug you found is > > not related to this information. Does the /etc/mdadm.conf file on this > > system use a device name wildcard? > > No. That's the contents: [...]
Oh well, please try installing this package:
http://people.debian.org/~benh/linux-base_3.2a~test_all.deb
(signature:
http://people.debian.org/~benh/linux-base_3.2a~test_all.deb.sig ;
source:
http://people.debian.org/~benh/linux-base_3.2a~test.dsc )
and run 'dpkg --reconfigure linux-base'. It should print an error
specifying which device is missing information.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
