From: Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:00:11 +0100

> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:38:28AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Richard Mortimer <ri...@oldelvet.org.uk>
>> > So that means that the kernel is complaining about type 54 which is
>> > R_SPARC_UA64. That matches with the objdump output which doesn't list
>> > R_SPARC_LM22 for scsi_mod.ko
>> 
>> Indeed, good catch :-)
>> That makes things different, I'll look into this, thanks.
> 
> If I see this correctly, then _UA64 is the same then _64 except for the
> alignment requirements; similar to _UA32 and _32. So this should be
> fixed by the following patch.

I didn't want to make this change until we understand why, after
all these years, ftrace is starting to emit things that cause
these relocations.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110115.112038.193706460.da...@davemloft.net

Reply via email to