tags 606806 pending stop On Sat, 11 Dec 2010, Evan Broder wrote:
> > I see. I wasn't aware of BUSYBOX=no. But looking at this again, I > think I actually want to take a different approach in order to > maintain the current semantics of setting root=X:Y. Ok great, applied in maks/num_root branch in http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=summary could you please have a look that i didn't botch the commit as I had to hand apply due to the attached patch, beeing against latest Ubuntu and having a strange patch level? pending review it will hit master which is scheduled for post squeeze fixes. thank you. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101214174203.gd18...@stro.at
