Your message dated Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:48:13 +0000
with message-id <1292305693.3136.557.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: linux-base: please suppress useless debconf messages on
first install
has caused the Debian Bug report #587887,
regarding linux-base: please suppress useless debconf messages on first install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
587887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587887
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: linux-base
version: 2.6.32-15
severity: wishlist
tags: patch
Hi,
first of all: thank you all for maintaining linux-2.6 - you're doing an
awesome job!
<h01ger> hi. i'm using .32.bpo on lenny, together with linux-base. so far so
good, works great. but i have an issue with automated installs (with d-i and
preseeding): linux-base informs me that /etc/fstab contains an entry
(/etc/scd0 iirc) which might not work in future versions. i couldnt care less
and would like to get rid of this warning,as it prevents fully automated
installations
<bwh^> h01ger: I put a heuristic in there to work out whether this is a fresh
installation or upgrade
<bwh^> h01ger: Maybe you can suggest how to improve it
<bwh^> (the problem is that linux-base did not exist in lenny, so we cannot
check whether the package itself is being upgraded)
<bwh^> Of course you should also be able to preseed the answer
<h01ger> i tried, using what debconf-get-selections |grep linux-base gave me
after an installation, but that didnt work
<bwh^> weird
# make linux-base install quietly
#
# Boot loader configuration check needed
linux-base linux-base/disk-id-manual-boot-loader error
# Configuration files still contain deprecated device names
linux-base linux-base/disk-id-manual error
# Apply configuration changes to disk device IDs?
linux-base linux-base/disk-id-convert-plan-no-relabel boolean true
# Opdater diskenheds-id'er i systemkonfigurationen?
linux-base linux-base/disk-id-convert-auto boolean true
# Apply configuration changes to disk device IDs?
linux-base linux-base/disk-id-convert-plan boolean true
<h01ger> bwh, i wonder if your test fails as there were already .26 packages
installed...
<h01ger> ha! if /var/log/installer doesnt exist, its a fresh install. bingo
see attached patch
<h01ger> bwh, do you want a wishlist bug about this?
<bwh^> h01ger: Yes, file a wishlist bug, please
cheers,
Holger
1578a1579,1581
> if !(-d '/var/log/installer') {
> return 0;
> }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This won't be done as you could not specify the condition to use.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
