On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:33:58PM -0500, Jonathan Williams wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2010, at 10:08 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > You're claiming that:
> > - This bug breaks every system where the package is installed
> reportbug only refers to "the whole system"; not *every* whole system,
> perhaps that should be clarified?
If you consider yourself not a novice (the reportbug default mode, where
critical is _not_ announced), you are supposed to know a bit about it.
> 2 breaks the whole system renders the entire system unusable (e.g.,
> unbootable, unable to reach a multiuser runlevel,
> etc.)
Where is this from? The official definition[1] is:
| makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole system) break, or
| causes serious data loss, or introduces a security hole on systems where
| you install the package.
Neither is the kernel unrelated to any other package (it is an implicit
dependency in any of them) nor does it cause data loss, nor does it
introduce a security hole.
> [ 0.000000] bootconsole [earlyprom0] enabled
Okay, it uses earlyprom0. But I don't see the console handover, that
should have done before the cgroup init.
Bastian
--
Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped.
-- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101122100030.ga23...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
