Just tried it on an older box I have here: 2.6.19-skas3-v9-pre9 (client) connecting to my drobo running 2.6.22.18 (Custom) and had the same issue.

So I am again, back to square one.. But with a second person having the same issue.


On 10-11-17 02:37 PM, Brian Stamper wrote:
Centos nfs4 server - 2.6.18-194.11.3.el5
RHEL nfs3 server - 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5
Fedora 13 client - 2.6.34.7-56.fc13.x86_64

I'm not registered on the Ubuntu support site, I found your issue via google.

-brian

On 11/17/10 11:26 AM, "Jason Kendall" <jakend...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Damnit.. That means its no longer my Drobo causing the issue.

    Could you layout the clients with kernel versions please? I'd like
    to go back to tracking this down. Maybe send it to me and the
    ticket. Your the first person to come forward with the same issue.


    On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Brian Stamper
    <bstam...@logyx.com> wrote:


        Varies actually, we've seen it on Fedora 13 clients connecting
        to a CentOS 5.5 server via nfsv4 and those same clients
        connecting to RHEL 5.5 server via nfsv3

        -brian



        On 11/17/10 11:20 AM, "Jason Kendall" <jakend...@gmail.com
        <http://jakend...@gmail.com> > wrote:

            Interesting.. what is your backend? (NFS Server?)


            On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Brian Stamper
            <bstam...@logyx.com <http://bstam...@logyx.com> > wrote:


                http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2010/10/msg00339.html

                Did you ever find an answer for this issue?  I'm
                running into the same thing on Fedora 13 and yours is
                the only report of it I've seen.  Same situation, I
                have an incoming directory with thousands of files
                that users attempt to mv, resulting in duplicate
                filenames showing up then disappearing eventually on
                their own.  One difference I've seen is that if I
                mv/rename a file, it is listed singular, but if I
                rename it back, it's once again duplicate, at least
                temporarily.

                If you got any further diagnosis or answers on this,
                I'd appreciate any info you have.

                -brian





Reply via email to