On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:51:49AM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote:
> * Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote:
> > CCing Jon, as maintainer of libcgroup he might be interested in this
> > discussion.
> >
> > Am 07.09.2010 23:12, schrieb Bastian Blank:
> > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:54:04PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > >> On 07.09.2010 22:41, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > >>> And what does this help? There are n cgroup filesystem hierarchies.
> > >> Are you referring to cgroup fs like cpuset? They would be mounted below
> > >> /sys/fs/cgroup.
> > >
> > > sysfs does not support mkdir. How will you mount _n_ different
> > > hierarchies?
> >
> > In the thread I quoted, G-K H mentions that /sys/fs/cgroup would be a tmpfs.
>
> I agree with not creating another top-level directory. I configured
> libcgroup to mount cgroupfs under /mnt/cgroup as an initial solution,
> but mounting in /sys/fs seems much more consistent with current
> conventions.
Using /mnt/cgroup is definitely wrong. FHS says that /mnt is reserved as a
temporary mountpoint for local use.
If there is a consensus upstream that /sys/fs/cgroup is the right place for
this filesystem, and this is needed in squeeze (rather than just for
systemd) then I think we would add that directory in the kernel package for
squeeze. Otherwise, this is for wheezy (and current experimental) only.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100914145957.gf11...@decadent.org.uk
