Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply! I'm amazed.
I cannot use your pre-built amd64 module because I'm not at work
anymore, and although I still have my phone with me, the machine I'm
using is a 686 now.
I cannot apply your patch either. I'm running testing, and the
rndis_host.c file looks like this:
int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
{
struct cdc_state *info = (void *) &dev->data;
int master_ifnum;
int retval;
unsigned count;
__le32 rsp;
u32 xid = 0, msg_len, request_id;
Which is obviously not what you diff'd against (the patch fails in this
area).
jonat...@nala:/tmp $ apt-cache show linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Priority: optional
Section: kernel
Installed-Size: 76316
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Should I source linux-2.6 from unstable?
jonathan
On 07/17/2010 05:06 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 16:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [...]
>> 2. Apply the attached patch and rebuild the kernel package by following
>> the instructions at
>> <http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official>.
> Really attached this time.
>
> Ben.
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c42eb19.3080...@gmail.com
