On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 11:50 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes ("Re: Bug#584881: Lockups under heavy disk IO; md (RAID)
> resync/check implicated"):
> > I/O barriers are block I/O operations (not specific to md) that inhibit
> > reordering of read and write operations. They certainly should not be
> > blocking operations. Also, device-mapper did not support barriers until
> > after 2.6.26 so md will not be using them in the configuration you are
> > using.
>
> No, I think there are two meanings of the word "barrier". AFAICT md
> has its own thing which it confusingly calls a "barrier"; it can be
> "raised" and "lowered".Oh, great! I wondered whether this was the case but I could only find discussion of md vs I/O barriers. Do you have any reference for documentation of md barriers? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
