On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:12:42AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 22:55:38 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> > In case 1, the boot loader should also be called by update-initramfs
> > when it is called outside of kernel package installation and removal.
> > This is normally covered by route D, but this seems a little fragile. I
> > would prefer to replace this with a hook system (as already exists for
> > building the initramfs itself), but I'm not that involved in
> > initramfs-tools development.
>
> That does seem like a more general-purpose solution, rather than having
> lilo and zipl treated as special cases. But please keep the appropriate
> parties informed of any future design changes to update-initramfs.
> I myself have never used yaird, but I assume that to be consistent it
> should have a similar hook system.
yaird is no longer present in testing or unstable, so it is a non-issue
as far as I'm concerned.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100623150405.gx5...@decadent.org.uk
