On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:30:58AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > I am not concerned that initramfs would not boot (which is what the > backup initramfs is for) but that the new kernel might not boot (or > might boot but bring the system up in unusable state) which is > unfortunately not uncommon. Then I would appreciate having an > up-to-date initramfs for the running kernel rather than later, > possibly broken kernel.
linux-2.6 early testers is not the major concern of the sorting alg, again thanks for raising the point. anyway if you want policy changes of initramfs next time please discuss that first on d-kernel or initra...@vger so that a consensus could emerge. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100622093117.gt9...@baikonur.stro.at
