On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:09:06PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Tuesday 11 May 2010 12:32:45 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Thanks Max. Am currently testing it. Will report results in a day or two. > > The bug got triggered in the very first run. Does not look fixed. dmesg > attached.
yes zut, but was worth a try, I can trigger it also: [45542.004293] swapper: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x4020 [45542.004305] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 [45542.004311] Call Trace: [45542.004315] <IRQ> [<ffffffff810b9bcf>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x55b/0x5d0 [45542.004359] [<ffffffffa03aa666>] ? iwl_rx_allocate+0x9f/0x2cb [iwlcore] cat /proc/version Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-13) (f...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) ) #1 SMP Sat May 8 22:47:58 CEST 2010 Ben other suggestion? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100511134705.gj13...@baikonur.stro.at
