On Sun, Apr 11 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>> The kernel team has made their level of commitment
>> clear, as is proper. Indeed, I don't expect the kernel team to support
>> either non-debian sources, nor _any_ third party modules, really.
>> Which is why I directed the user to make-kpkg, which does, to an
>> extent, supports both.
>
> which is wrong, you can easily build your oot black magic
> with linux-kbuild, who is in stable/testing/sid just not in exp.
Sure. There is more than one way to do things. It just seems
that there are lags between the kbuild packages and image packages, and
of course the kbuild does not support non-debian-source packages,
right?
> and even there it is trivial and just a matter of svn co and debuild:
> svn co svn://svn.debian.org/kernel/dists/trunk/linux-kbuild-2.6
> debuild
Seems like a viable approach, though only for things in the
Debian kernel tree. It also boils down to personal taste; using
make-kpkg works for other trees apart from just Debian's.
Unless I am missing the fact that kbuild supports arbitrary
kernel trees?
manoj
--
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having sense enough to be
lazy. Charlie McCarthy
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
4096R/C5779A1C E37E 5EC5 2A01 DA25 AD20 05B6 CF48 9438 C577 9A1C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aat81sym....@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com
