On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 03:39:53AM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> >> [38198.312686] ondemand governor failed, too long transition latency
> >> of HW, fallback to performance governor
> > But now it is clear that the behaviour otherwise is correct. If the
> > hardware is not capable to do something, it is no software bug.
> The hardware didn't change; the kernel did. Either the kernel was
> wrong to permit on-demand frequency scaling before, or it's wrong to
> refuse it now.
The kernel was wrong before.
Bastian
--
If I can have honesty, it's easier to overlook mistakes.
-- Kirk, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100226181157.ga25...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
