Moritz,
I am not affected by the bug and thus am not in a position to test the
fix. (I was just doing casual bug triaging and saw and merged all the
identical nfsd problems and while doing it googled whether there wasn't
allready a fix for them).
One of the bug reporters could try the sqeeze kernel.
Thanks,
*t
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:59:26PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:36:40PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
The fix to the problem seems to be available upstream:
http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/2009-March/010018.html
From Debian changelogs as of 2.6.26-21lenny3 it seems that this particular
fix hasn't been included yet?
could be was too lazy to check first but got
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c.rej
yes so it is in
debian/patches/bugfix/all/sunrpc-add-sv_maxconn-field-to-svc_serv.patch
in 2.6.26-14
In which case that patch doesn't fix the problem (or a similar
problem), since several of the reporters have kernels > 2.6.26-14.
* 2.6.26-17: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516376#19
* 2.6.26-17lenny1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516376#24
* 2.6.26-17: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538000
* 2.6.26-15lenny3: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532561#5
Hi,
The next release of Debian (6.0, code name Squeeze) will be based
on 2.6.32. Please test the current 2.6.32 from unstable/testing and tell
us whether the problem persists. If so, we should report it upstream
to the kernel.org developers.
The 2.6.32 kernel is available from packages.debian.org and can
be installed in both Debian stable, testing and unstable
installations.
Thanks,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1002201127080.23...@tpo-laptop
