On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 20:02:31 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100125 19:27]: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 18:56:47 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > > > > I guess this means that the next version is no candidate for the release > > > unless it gets a stable ABI (versioning) and should block the kernel > > > from migrating for the time being? > > > > > The 2.6.30 kernel and the current 2.6.32 one aren't candidates either, > > so I'm not sure what difference blocking the next one makes. > > That our testing users don't have to life with strange error messages > they wouldn't get if the abi would be bumped properly. > Yeah, that sounds oh so much more important than getting proper testing for the kernel we're going to release with. Or than getting (security and otherwise) bugs fixed quickly.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
