Hi,
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 09:28:09PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:12:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.31-2
>
> This is not the latest version, please update.
wou...@celtic:~$ LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy linux-image-$(uname -r)
linux-image-2.6.31-1-amd64:
Installed: 2.6.31-2
Candidate: 2.6.31-2
Version table:
*** 2.6.31-2 0
500 http://apt-cacher.grep.be unstable/main Packages
500 http://ftp.be.debian.org unstable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
That's today, after an 'apt-get update'. I don't think so.
> > However, when trying to use xrandr to move the resolution to the native
> > output resolution of that second monitor, I found that I could not do
> > so; instead, the system refused to go beyond the resolution which the TV
> > had in its EDID data. Additionally, the 1330xsomething resolution
> > supported by the TV, while supported by the monitor, is not actually
> > shown in its EDID data (at least not after a reboot).
>
> What is the output of xrandr? How does it refuse to move the resolution?
When I run 'xrandr' without arguments, it still only shows the supported
resolutions of the original monitor, rather than those of the monitor
that I'm connected to at that point.
--
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is
trying to fool the system.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
