On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I think this is best held on -devel, since a wider audience will
>> benefit from this.
>
> I've replied to d-kernel, but thanks for this "heads up" to d-devel.
> If there is sufficient interest in the topic, we can summarize for or
> restart on d-devel.
Well, I am not subscribed to debian-kernel, which seems to be
mostly a team internal mailing list for dealing with bugs, and doing
internal scheduling of team activities for the most part, and deals
mostly with issues related to official kernel images. And yes, oficial
kernel images are one such stakeholder. People builkdihg their own
images, using either kernel-package, or the upstream make-deb are
usually not subscribed to the official kernel team internal mailing
list.
However, if we are going to move a working solution over to
-policy at some point, I would like to get some feedback from the other
developers; such technical expertise is always welcome.
Hence, I again request that the discussion be opened to a wider
audience, since we are talking about systems integration of services
related to kernel image, header, doc, and source packages. I would also
like to get feedback from people who compile and run Xen and UML
images.
Thanks
manoj
--
"Little else matters than to write good code." Karl Lehenbauer
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
