On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 05:17:08PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 07:56:55PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> > > >> > Hello RM and SRM teams, > >> > > >> > I hereby ask for a block on linux-2.6 source package until d-i Beta1 > >> > gets out. If it migrates before we do the final images we can need to > >> > delay d-i release. > >> > >> nacked as maintainer, > >> you are blocking for more then 2 weeks linux-2.6 migration to testing. > >> we need massife testing of 2.6.24 for etch+half, sid is not enough. > >> > >> also 2.6.22 was meant to be ready 4 month ago, sorry but > >> that schedule is over. > >> > >> > As discussed[1] previously at debian-boot we've decided to stay at > >> > 2.6.22 for this release and do a release as fast as possible with > >> > 2.6.24. > >> > > >> > 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2008/02/msg00012.html > >> > >> very bad decision 2.6.24 is needed for a lot of recent hardware, > >> d-i doesn't install on those. > > > > ... and etch+1 2.6.24 should just be built with the proper options to > > still include deprecated /proc/acpi stuff (and probably disable the new > > interfaces for them, too, as it can have bad side effects on, e.g. hal > > (though I don't know if etch's hal supports /sys/class/power_supply)). > > This needs to be done, specially for Etch+Half kernels. It has been > done for sid kernels in 2.6.24-3 upload.
Though 2.6.24-3 onwards also includes the /sys/class/power_supply stuff, and unless hal gets fixed (and it is fixed in upstream git), a few software will report twice as much batteries as really present. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
