On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:52:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > maximilian attems wrote: > > thanks for quick feedback, have prebuild 2.6.25-rc1-git2 > > (they contain the security fix, but don't seem to suspend here) > > anyway please test for boot > > -> http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/2.6.25-rc1-git2/ > > Still fails the same. > > > if those again don't boot please file info upstream on > > bugzilla.kernel.org so that relevant new x86 arch maintainer > > fix that up. > > Um, could the kernel team forward this bug?
well we have no automated way to do so as we are underpowered in terms of bug nrs, it is routine to ask to file upstream. the debian kernel does not carry any x86 specific patch. also it is often much easier if upstream speaks directly with the person that has the hardware at hand. > * I don't have an account on this bugzilla, or actually, on any bugzilla > on earth. > * I don't know exactly what versions you've had me test. > * I guess they'll want to know things about compile options that I don't > know. sure, ack. so i'll circumvent bugzilla and add the new x86 maintainers on cc to let them know about the 2.6.24 and 2.6.25-rc1 boot error on shiny fujitsu p700 lifebook, with a Crusoe processor. http://bugs.debian.org/464962 686 config attached.
config-2.6.24-1-686.bz2
Description: Binary data
