Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2007-09-12, Faidon Liambotis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> >> You're not checking for copyright violations or for non-free stuff in >> all other packages. I obviously meant all other *existing* source packages, i.e. all the uploads that don't pass through NEW.
>> The only reason that things like linux-2.6.XX pass through NEW is, from >> my POV, because noone stepped up to fix it so that old source packages >> don't have to pass through. > > I don't consider it something needing fixing. > It is a good way to have the copyright files occasionally reviewed. I don't think that old source packages are re-reviewed for copyright violations/non-freeness. But I could easily be wrong. Even if that is not the case, I don't think that Joerg's time should be spent that way, TBH -- but that not up to me :) Regards, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
