Hi Maximilian On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 08:47:57PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:21:15PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hi > > > > I understand. However openvz have several advantages over vserver as > > it support live migration. > > vserver existed already in debian for longer with a patch, > plus upstream is directly responsive on bugs. > i guess it is the matter of beeing the first.
Oh, yes I know. I'm the maintainer of vserver as well. And was the maintainer of the kernel patch as well. However it was not I that requested the inclusion to the kernel package, but rather my co-maintainer. I can also assure you that upstream is very responsive on bugs in the case of openvz. > > I can see that the Xen version of the kernel has been removed with > > recent images. Is that one already included upstream? > > xen is on the way to be merged, domU is in 2.6.23 > but the reason there is currently no linux xen image is that > upstream provided no patch for any kernel later than 2.6.18 I see. If I can convince upstream to give support to the Debian variant of the kernel, there is no way to get in openvz? I mean if we can remove xen, there will be plenty of room for openvz, right? :) If I get some basic instructions (more or less verify what I think I need to do to get the support working) I can help maintain that part of the kernel tree. Best regards, // Ola > best regards > > -- > maks > -- --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering ---- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://opalsys.net/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
