On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:21:48AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:09:50PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:45:47PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > heya,
> > > upload planed for wednesday to experimental. > > > to make it available, also due to dynticks it sounds like the much better > > > candidate for the next d-i beta round. although there is no new xen > > > patch, kvm should already be interesting in 2.6.21. > > > buildserver seem not to pick up trunk. > > Will there be any more 2.6.20 uploads for sid? There are 1-2 RC bugs > > that can be fixed (iirc), I've just been holding off on them because I > > saw "2.6.21 sid" in the topic. > well if the consesus is that 2.6.21 belongs to sid, > i'm very happy with that. If 2.6.20 is in good shape otherwise, I think it would be beneficial to push 2.6.20 into testing so we have an updated kernel there sooner rather than later; I know the SRMs are itching to have a kernel update for etch r1, and having a newer kernel in testing is a prereq for that, plus the sooner we can get linux-libc-dev into testing the better IMHO. This does require one more round of kernel new processing anyway for alpha, so I guess my opinion on whether we should have another upload of 2.6.20 depends on how long folks think that NEW processing would take vs. how long getting 2.6.21 into a testing-worthy state will take. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
