Eduard, I'm having some issues with the numbering for packages generated with module-assistant.
Are we able to change the numbering of the packages generated from m-a? #402811 is also having the same problem. Mark ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [Pkg-mythtv-maintainers] Re: ivtv-modules Date: Tuesday 10 April 2007 11:45 From: "Mark Purcell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I don't think so, because all the kernel related packages do generate > their control rather than beeing handwritten, so, it's not possible to > add package specific stuff without either injecting it manually for > every upload, or, to add checks to gencontrol.py, which is very ugly too. Daniel, On a related note the versioning for the ivtv-modules seems to be different depent on the way you build them. For example from the conglomeration module package we have the following: ivtv-modules 2.6.18+0.8.2-4+etch1 But if you build by hand using modules-assistant and ivtv-source you get ivtv-modules 0.10.1-1+2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 Thus in one package the kernel version is coming first, in the second the modules package are coming first, which leads to this situation: ivtv-modules-2.6.18-4-686/etch upgradeable from 0.10.1-1+2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 to 2.6.18+0.8.2-4+etch1 Where the system thinks a downgrade is actually an upgrade :-( I presume that the conglomeration module packages are all pre-defined this way, so we should change the outcome of a modules-assistant build in our ivtv-source pacakage? Mark _______________________________________________ pkg-mythtv-maintainers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mythtv-maintainers -------------------------------------------------------
pgpjvFWRTywJP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
