* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070331 12:59]: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 01:29:04AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > I would say (although I'm by any means not kernel expert) that your > > patch looks good and I _strongly_ recommend to include it in etch r0 (!!)... > > You're the release manager,... so you should get managed this :-) > > It wouldn't be appropriate for me to push this without the consent of the > rest of the kernel team just because I'm the release manager; I'm not even > an amd64 porter, this should be signed off on by the folks who are actually > responsible for the amd64 kernel first. But regardless, there are no plans > for another kernel update before etch r0, and including one is likely to > delay the release. I'm of the opinion that this bug does not justify a > delay at this point. > > With the consent of the kernel team and the stable release managers, I'm > happy to commit this patch to the queue for the next kernel update though, > so it can be included in etch r1.
BTW, we intended to have frequent kernel uploads to proposed-updates, and frankly speaking, I personally don't mind to already have a newer kernel in proposed-updates during the release, but that's something I want to have signed-off by Martin. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
