On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:44:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > Steve asked on IRC about doing a -12 for 4.0r0. There are a few RC > bugs and a few security bugs that we could fix before then. > > Of those present on IRC (vorlon, fjp, fs and myself), there was a > consensus to proceed. Does anyone on the kernel team object to this?
I have five pending sparc bugfixes, already committed to etch branch, all usertagged dkt-etch-updates: #415818 fixes boot failure on E450 machines #412749 fixes unaligned access in ether1394_reset_priv() #409313 fixes frequent unaligned accesses in ip_rcv() and ip_fast_csum() #414877 fixes kenvctrld so it does not consume 100% CPU #415819 fixes oops in tcp_sendmsg on T1k/T2k machines under heavy network load I've added the last patch today. As I don't have access to a useable sparc machine at the moment, I'm CC'ing Emanuele Rocca, who should be able to do a test build and confirm that the resulting kernel boots properly. Best regards, -- Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
